Hexacore means the processor comes with 6 physical cores, and octa-core means it has 8 physical cores. Each core on the processor has a location on the chip that you can see, if the processor has 6 cores, then you will physically see six cores on the chip. DockingKeyboard Case for Vastking Kingpad K10 Android 10 Tablet. Vastking KingPad K10 Pro (artist review ). Butthat's not comparable to Dolphin, because the PS3 has multiple CPU cores and the GameCube/Wii doesn't. Also, "using more threads" doesn't mean linear performance increase - having a thread do dsp/gpu/other stuff means jack if it's sitting at 10% utilisation on a core > bottlenecked by the 'cpu' thread. Hexacore adalah 6 inti. Octa core adalah 8 inti. Deca core adalah 10 inti. Dan begitu seterusnya. Pada smartphone di era sekarang, jumlah inti prosesor tersebut terkadang bisa mengecoh kita sebagai konsumen. Penjelasan lebih lanjut akan kita bahas di bawah yaa. As a deca-core processor uses 10 cores to complete its tasks, it is normal that Comparisonbetween Rockchip PX6 and Hexa core with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the performance in benchmark platforms such as Geekbench 4, Passmark, Cinebench or AnTuTu. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest UnisocT616 Vs Snapdragon 680 | Antutu Benchmark & Specification By:- Gadget Master 99 (GM99)..#UnisocT616VsSnapdragon680#UnisocT616VsSD680# Unisoc . THANKSFOR WATCHING !! I WILL MAKE ONE MORE FRESH VIDEO ABOUT PROCESSOR!LIKE | SHARE | SUBSCRIBEGuys Where you Think To Message Me you Can Messege ! My Name differentcores processors available depend upon speed clean clean explanation about video don 't forget to watch.. LEARN-LIKE DECAInc. is committed to creating and maintaining a healthy and respectful environment for all of our emerging leaders and entrepreneurs. Our philosophy is to ensure all members, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, or socio-economic status are treated equally and respectfully.. "/> Butthe price is not as high as the octa core processors. The maintenance costs of the hexa core processors are also high. 6. Energy consumption. Being a more updated and powerful product, this processor consumes more energy. The power consumption of this type of processor is higher than the quad core processors. cS1aj. You weren't right so long! The chip maker MediaTek pioneered the concept of with the launch of the Helio X20 processor. Lately, the company added another deca-core chipset to the lineup with the introduction of the Helio there is a new deca-core chip in the market, we will witness the launch of smartphones equipped with the same in the coming months. Undoubtedly, these smartphones will be flagship models. But, when it comes to the buyers' perspective, we need to accept the fact that it could be too confusing to choose a smartphone due to the different options available in the Tech Controversies of 2016 Galaxy Note 7, Reliance Jio & MoreIt can be said that buying an Android phone is an overwhelming task as there is a wide variety of choices. The task becomes tougher as the makers use their own techniques to confuse the buyers. Sometimes, you might come to the conclusion that buying a deca-core processor equipped phone is a good decision as the chipset is better than an octa-core one due to the higher number of cores. But, that's not always true as choosing a processor shouldn't be done based on the number of cores You Should Never Buy At An Apple StoreToday, we at GizBot, have decided to shed light on the different multi-core processors that exist in the market right now, starting from dual-core to deca-core and the number of cores that one actually need to get a better user experience. Do educate yourself on the same from below. Multi-core Processors That Exist Dual-core Processors In the dual-core processors, the CPU will have two cores in each processor. The dual-core processors will have a couple of processors that are combined with each other and the cache and cache controllers of these will be integrated onto a single circuit. Quad-core Processors This is a chip with four cores that can read data and execute tasks independently. Each core will operate in conjunction with the other circuits including memory management, cache, and I/O ports. Also, each core in the quad-core processors can run several instructions simultaneously, which will increase the speed of the system by means of parallel processing. Hexa-core Processors The hexa-core processors use six cores as the name suggests. These can handle the assigned tasks in a much faster and better way than the dual-core and quad-core processors. Usually, these chipsets use a quad-core processor and a dual-core processor. Octa-core Processors Octa-core processors use eight cores to perform the assigned task efficiently. Eventually, the octa-core processors render a 200% increase in the overall speed of the system than the quad-core processors. In some octa-core processors, there are two sets of quad-core processors used and these quad-core chips will be given different tasks based on the intensity of the task and the ability of the chipset. Deca-core Processors It goes without saying that the deca-core processors use 10 cores to complete the tasks in a more efficient way than the other processors. Undoubtedly, having an efficient deca-core processor will make the system super fast. These are the latest ones in the market and only a few smartphones have such processors. We can expect to see more such processors in the devices that will be launched in 2017. Also Read LTE vs LTE Advanced What's the Difference? How a Deca-core Processor Works? When it comes to the MediaTek MT6797 Helio X20, which is the first deca-core processor to be launched in the market, it has two quad-core configurations and a dual-core configuration on a single SoC. The four Cortex A53 cores are meant to handle the basic tasks such as general navigation, and the other four Cortex A53 cores that are clocked faster are meant for more demanding tasks. The other two Cortex A72 cores are meant to deal with tasks that are more intense such as 3D photography and 4K video recording. With the dual-core processor used for the high-end tasks, there rises another question. The question is, are the quad-core chipsets necessary. While many may answer "no" to this question, we would like to make it clear that a fast dual-core setup is optimal for a modern day smartphone in the place of an average quad-core processor. Also Read Key Things to Know Before You Buy a New Computer Deca-core Processor A Brief Analysis Talking about the deca-core processors, we can't rule out the factor that a smartphone with more cores will render better performance. But, it is true only in some cases. There are two terms related to processors - core and clock speed. Each core is a tiny processor that can work independently and the higher the number of cores the more tasks the phone can do at the same time. When it comes to clock speed, it is the GHz number given next to each processor. The higher the clock speed the faster the core can complete a given task. If you think that a deca-core processor is pretty powerful, you need to know that your aren't right all the time. However, most smartphone functions and apps are single-threaded, which points out that each app or function can be handled by just one core at a time. Eventually, even if you are playing a heave game on a deca-core processor equipped phone, only a single core will be used for the task. In that case, a dual-core processor with higher clock speed will be better in terms of performance in comparison to a deca-core processor. Also Read USB Type-C What Is It and How Is It Better Than Its Predecessors? Final Words As of now, the deca-core processor phones are pretty rare and expensive. If there exists a deca-core processor with a high clock speed, it is definitely a masterpiece. However, keep in mind that it will prove to be worthy only if you are a person who often runs 10 apps simultaneously its pretty rare, though. If not, a quad-core or an octa-core processor, which has a higher clock speed will be sufficient to offer seamless performance! Best Mobiles in India Best Cameras Best Selling Upcoming 1,24,999 79,999 1,39,900 89,900 84,999 82,999 59,400 74,999 94,999 79,999 65,900 13,999 6,499 13,499 11,999 1,29,900 17,990 12,999 7,332 13,999 24,867 8,799 22,999 31,840 11,440 8,150 46,340 9,694 34,880 32,696 You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites should upgrade or use an alternative browser. 1 Hey guys, if I'm looking forward to buy a cpu with a hefty budget to spend, what processor should I buy? An octa core or a hexa core one considering that I don't want to upgrade cpu again for atleast 5-6 years Alpha3031 Apr 9, 2015 Form Please fill. Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 2 Form Please fill. 3 I said "if" Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 4 If it were me the minimum core count for an intel CPU would be 6 cores if your wanting 5+ years out of it, 8 would be better. I would also plan on overclocking to squeeze more performance from my CPU over time. Ex. I got a i7 3930k 3 years ago. i initially overclocked it to January made some new OC profiles stable up to maybe but it needs more testing still to be sure. It allows me to get more from my cpu over time. Yeah i could have cranked up the core speed from the get go but i would not have seen the benefits later as it would have already felt like the norm, plus when you OC you wear things out faster so there is that to consider in the parts longevity. Sep 30, 2012 1,269 1 11,960 5 You kinda answered your own question. You'll obviously want to buy the absolute best you can afford if you want maximum longevity, and right now with x99, the choice is even more clear-cut than with previous x79 setups since with the current lineup, the top-end i7 has more cores than the model down. Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 6 [quotemsg=15647161,0,1935761]I said "if" [/quotemsg] Well, if we have no idea what you're going to do with it, how are we supposed to make suggestions? For all we know, you could want the CPU to surf the web with. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 7 [quotemsg=15647180,0,936635]You kinda answered your own question. You'll obviously want to buy the absolute best you can afford if you want maximum longevity, and right now with x99, the choice is even more clear-cut than with previous x79 setups since with the current lineup, the top-end i7 has more cores than the model down.[/quotemsg] kinda true 8 it depends, we talking 6300 or 9590? or 5820k or 5960x 9 Intel only. 5820k/5930k and 5960x 10 This thread is under PC gaming category. So obviously I am a gamer. And I am confused because some hexa cores outperform the 5960x in benchmarks Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 11 [quotemsg=15648418,0,1935761]This thread is under PC gaming category. So obviously I am a gamer. And I am confused because some hexa cores outperform the 5960x in benchmarks[/quotemsg] while true for the moment heck some quad core's out perform hexa cores as well...clock speed, architecture make a difference. That said with consoles having 8 core CPU's and multi-core/ multi-thread CPUs in PC becoming common place. In the next few years 8 cores/threads+ could well be the new gold standard. The Op was wanting something for 5+ years so it's reasonable to think two more cores will be useful in that time frame instead of just six. 12 [quotemsg=15648418,0,1935761]This thread is under PC gaming category. So obviously I am a gamer. And I am confused because some hexa cores outperform the 5960x in benchmarks[/quotemsg] Because the 5960x isnt meant for gaming.... hence its low stock clock speed. The 4790k is the best gaming CPU out right now. The extreme series Haswell-e is for enthusiast builders, video editors, servers.. etc not gamers. Go with the 4790k and you should be gold for about 4-5 years. Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 13 I'd go 5820K and custom liquid cooling. Plenty of space for 3/4 GPU setups. you'll need a full tower case too. Though it does depend on what games you play. Some games still only use one or two cores. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 14 [quotemsg=15648940,0,1493684]I'd go 5820K and custom liquid cooling. Plenty of space for 3/4 GPU setups. you'll need a full tower case too. Though it does depend on what games you play. Some games still only use one or two cores.[/quotemsg] yeah i have to disagree with the 3 to 4 GPU part...the 5820k only has 20 PCIe lanes...good for dual GPU or single GPU and an SSD but not both, there are just not enough PCIe lanes to handle it. In fact many Mobo manufacturers warn users of this in their Mobo website/users manuals online. That is exactly why there is a 5830k with 40 PCIe lanes to handle that kind of bandwidth. Not to say the 5820k is a bad CPU but one needs to be aware of it's strengths and weaknesses before making a choice. And yes i have seen all the charts showing the "minimal" loss in frames even when dropping a GPU to PCIe 4x but if your spending the kind of money one is spending on a Extreme Series MOBO and CPU it hardly makes sense to kneecap your gaming performance even if ever so slightly for the get go. Call me crazy. Oct 19, 2007 3,226 6 21,415 15 Wait till DX12 comes out. It "might" be a game changer in terms of number of cores in a cpu. Its a rather smart move to wait and see roudups in games and other software on dx12. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 16 [quotemsg=15649243,0,151198]Wait till DX12 comes out. It "might" be a game changer in terms of number of cores in a cpu. Its a rather smart move to wait and see roudups in games and other software on dx12.[/quotemsg] yeah something to be said for that...down side though even with windows 10 launching this summer it will probably be 2016 before we see DX12 games or very many of them at least. So you could wait and if you can it might be worth it but generally speaking i buy whats available and best today...not tomorrow. The future is always uncertain and computers change at break neck pace. Though it's slowing, if you ask me, on the CPU side...sandy bridge to ivy bridge to haswell....the gains are minimal performance wise and in some cases a back step though power efficiency is much better with the newer generations. Sadly efficiency seems to be the focus not pure performance anymore. 17 I was thinking about buying the best octa core processor by this fall in time for black froday sales along wuth a dual gpu probably 980Ti which would be launched by then. Can a mid tower cabinet with asus x99-a support that? Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 18 [quotemsg=15649095,0,146991]yeah i have to disagree with the 3 to 4 GPU part...the 5820k only has 20 PCIe lanes...good for dual GPU or single GPU and an SSD but not both, there are just not enough PCIe lanes to handle it. In fact many Mobo manufacturers warn users of this in their Mobo website/users manuals online. That is exactly why there is a 5830k with 40 PCIe lanes to handle that kind of bandwidth. Not to say the 5820k is a bad CPU but one needs to be aware of it's strengths and weaknesses before making a choice. And yes i have seen all the charts showing the "minimal" loss in frames even when dropping a GPU to PCIe 4x but if your spending the kind of money one is spending on a Extreme Series MOBO and CPU it hardly makes sense to kneecap your gaming performance even if ever so slightly for the get go. Call me crazy. [/quotemsg] I probably should have added something to my post that said I was sleepy and not to take me seriously. Still, some boards do have PCI-E lane multiplier thingamajigs. 5820K for 2 GPU, 5930K for 3 GPU. though if you get the dual GPU cards... Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 19 [quotemsg=15653911,0,1493684][quotemsg=15649095,0,146991]yeah i have to disagree with the 3 to 4 GPU part...the 5820k only has 20 PCIe lanes...good for dual GPU or single GPU and an SSD but not both, there are just not enough PCIe lanes to handle it. In fact many Mobo manufacturers warn users of this in their Mobo website/users manuals online. That is exactly why there is a 5830k with 40 PCIe lanes to handle that kind of bandwidth. Not to say the 5820k is a bad CPU but one needs to be aware of it's strengths and weaknesses before making a choice. And yes i have seen all the charts showing the "minimal" loss in frames even when dropping a GPU to PCIe 4x but if your spending the kind of money one is spending on a Extreme Series MOBO and CPU it hardly makes sense to kneecap your gaming performance even if ever so slightly for the get go. Call me crazy. [/quotemsg] I probably should have added something to my post that said I was sleepy and not to take me seriously. Still, some boards do have PCI-E lane multiplier thingamajigs. 5820K for 2 GPU, 5930K for 3 GPU. though if you get the dual GPU cards...[/quotemsg] LOL been there brother...yeah you can get a multiplier as mentioned on some motherboards but it adds latency and is generally not the best option IMO. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 21 [quotemsg=15654560,0,1935761]5820k can run sli? [/quotemsg] yes but its best suited for dual card or single GPU with an SSD. thats what we were talking about. if you want to do three or four GPUs..or even a dual GPU with an SSD which uses 4 PCIe lanes, then it becomes less ideal and you want the i7 5930k for the greater PCIe lanes it has. 22 pointless to use more than a 2 way sli. If I go for a haswell e cpu, I will have to keep x99. But I'm afraid I will have to upgrade my gpu in few years to next gen, nvlink stuff. Will my x99 support that? Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 23 [quotemsg=15654811,0,1935761]pointless to use more than a 2 way sli. If I go for a haswell e cpu, I will have to keep x99. But I'm afraid I will have to upgrade my gpu in few years to next gen, nvlink stuff. Will my x99 support that? [/quotemsg] Yes and no. i run dual gpu plus a card for physx 3 GPUs and there for I need the PCIe lanes, one reason i have a i7 3930k compared to a quad core, that and i do a lot of video encoding...i have enough physx games in my library a dedicated physx is worth it for me. As for the NVlink i believe that come with pascal and there are no motherboards with that slot yet on the market. So its out of reach for now. 24 So should I go for cheaper 4790k and z97 extreme then? With 970 sli as I don't do anything else other than gaming. That should last me 4 or 5 years maybe. Jan 9, 2015 1,072 0 19,660 25 Honestly we have the 2 most exciting games in the last few years, coming next 2 month. This fact already worth to build a PC to play them on ultra. I think you shoudln'T worry about beeing future proof for 5-6 years, because it is impossible to do so. If you understand the Moore law in electronics, you'll already know why. Both Intel and nvidia's new architectures are in the gate. And actually if you own an expensive PC you can sell it whenever you want and rebuild from scratch. Especially with active warranty on the parts. The main decision you should make if you want to play in 4k or 1080p. - For 1080p a z97,i7 4790k and a single gtx 980 is the best choice. it maxes all games with 60fps+. Then when new architectures hit, you sell rebuild, simple as that. - For 4k gaming x99, i7 5930k, single or sli titan-x is the only smart choice. Note that people will tell things like 970 sli and 980 sli is good enough for 4k or 1440p, but they are wrong in both cases. The reason for this is the texture size that modern games use. the 970 is not even a choice for 1440p because of 3,5gb vram limitation. most of modern games are optimized to run on ultra on a 4gb card on 1080p resolution. With the titan-x and the 6core you would be a bit more future proof, but it's still not worth to wait the warranty to end, so you are in the same boat. For now, i'd advice to go 1080p and z97, single 980 with i7 4790 or 4790k, except if you have tons of disposable cash and you really want to go 4k now. Similar threads Advertising Cookies Policies Privacy Term & Conditions